Adebisi, O. I.
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
Adejumobi, I. A.
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
Jokojeje, R. A.
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Moshood Abiola Polytechnic, Abeokuta
Amusa, K. A.
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
ABSTRACT
The effective
performance of any system is determined usually by its present and future
reliability status, using appropriate forecast techniques. Reliability is an
inverse characteristic of the system failure rates. In recent years in Nigeria,
satisfactory degree of reliability has not been obtained in our distribution
system, most especially in urban commercial cities. One of the quantitative
forecasting techniques is the use of least square regression analysis. Using Federal University of Agriculture
Abeokuta (FUNAAB) 33 kV distribution network in Abeokuta, Ogun state as a case
study, the available five years (2010-2014) fault data were used to determine
the forecast model for the network. The appropriateness of the initial
developed model equations from the
observed fault data were diagnostically checked using minimum sum of the error square () and coefficient of the determination (R2). Where the model
equation fails to satisfy R2 conditions, R2 adjusted () was used. Results from the
analysis showed that the technique produced satisfactory forecast model
equations. The results from the analysis also showed that the mean time between
failures reduces in hours as failure rate increases while reliability will
decline from 74.79% in 2010 to approximately 0% in 2019, if no urgent actions
are taken.
Keywords: Distribution system, Fault, Least square regression, Mean time between failure Reliability, FUNAAB 33 kV distribution network
|
View: 267 | Download: 5
Published
Monday, June 27, 2016
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1, JUNE 2016
Article Section
GENERAL
The contents of the articles are the sole opinion of the author(s) and not of UJET.
|